Compression on L2 cache?

FAQ, getting help, user experience about FancyCache
Post Reply
kukreknecmi
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:14 pm

Compression on L2 cache?

Post by kukreknecmi »

Does Fancy Cache supports/operates compression? I guess readyboost is using some kind of compression and it is said more or less it success around 2:1 compression. I wonder if fancycache support any kind of compression on L1 or L2, or if there isnt any, are any plans on implementing a compression. Something like compcache i guess.
User avatar
intika
Level 9
Level 9
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:10 am

Re: Compression on L2 cache?

Post by intika »

good idea ! may be if we could set the compression level it will be better...
i don't think it support compression for now, but support will tell exactly...
don't forget that compression will use cpu... make computer hotter, and user more battery on laptop...
User avatar
Support
Support Team
Support Team
Posts: 3731
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:42 am

Re: Compression on L2 cache?

Post by Support »

Currently we've no plan to support compression. The compression increases cache capacity, but it degrade the access speed.
sparkler
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Compression on L2 cache?

Post by sparkler »

yes but its still faster access time then a hdd
User avatar
intika
Level 9
Level 9
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:10 am

Re: Compression on L2 cache?

Post by intika »

i think this stuff will make the machine buggy when you will be using a lot of softs at same time... maybe developer should test and see
User avatar
Nina
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 2:21 pm

Re: Compression on L2 cache?

Post by Nina »

I believe that it's possible to get the same result if you're using NTFS compression.. Compressed NTFS data chunks will be cached as it is in Fancy Cache buffer.. Maybe I'm wrong..
User avatar
intika
Level 9
Level 9
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 1:10 am

Re: Compression on L2 cache?

Post by intika »

oho ! good idea Nina :) ! ... but one the data is read it's uncompressed... it depend on how fc work...
Last edited by intika on Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
sparkler
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Compression on L2 cache?

Post by sparkler »

NTFS compression requires an NTFS partition that journals data = more wear to SSD also the MTF wastes quite a bit of space
BikeHelmet
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:33 am

Re: Compression on L2 cache?

Post by BikeHelmet »

sparkler wrote:NTFS compression requires an NTFS partition that journals data = more wear to SSD also the MTF wastes quite a bit of space
That can't be true. fsutil usn queryjournal reports that journaling is off for my drives, yet I'm definitely using NTFS compression. (How else would I fit 600GB of Steam games on a 500GB partition?)

I seem to recall the journal also being visible in Defraggler, but after turning it off it vanished. They don't seem to be connected. It's definitely possible to have one or the other on XP.
-BikeHelmet
Post Reply