Page 1 of 1
[defer-write] fast speed process (?)
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 3:44 am
by sokolov
I am sorry my language!
interested only increase speed defer-write process!
- primocache.jpg (106.58 KiB) Viewed 6215 times
Primocache, it's best,
very best!
Re: [defer-write] fast speed process (?)
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 5:12 am
by Support
It is better to use 64KB to match your cluster size.
Re: [defer-write] fast speed process (?)
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 5:27 am
by sokolov
4KB - ?
512 - ?
Comment please..
Re: [defer-write] fast speed process (?)
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 5:44 am
by Support
For defer-write, block size won't affect the speed too much. But the best speed can be reached with the block size equal to the cluster size.
Re: [defer-write] fast speed process (?)
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:01 am
by sokolov
Ok. I have one question, block size (PrimoCache), it's what? It's block write to hdd or it's data in RAM?
View:
4096 (my cache) what size blocks data? or no blocks? ..or?
I'm sorry my bad language, you understand me?))
Re: [defer-write] fast speed process (?)
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:20 am
by sokolov
I am more than confident that I'll buy a license.
Re: [defer-write] fast speed process (?)
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 3:22 am
by Support
Block Size: Cache is logically partitioned into blocks of fixed size, typically ranging from 4KB to 512KB. Cache block is the smallest unit that PrimoCache manages. A smaller block size brings more available blocks for the same amount of cache space and usually higher performance. However, it will need larger memory overhead and may cause heavy CPU overload.
Re: [defer-write] fast speed process (?)
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 6:43 am
by sokolov
Thank you very much!
strikeout text ...
I am amazed by this program is simple! What do you think:
32 Gb PrimoCache (idle-write) & HDD vs SSD (sandforce)?
PC: typical home computer
I am interested in your answer.