Hi,
I have a REFS Storage Spaces volume on Win 10 workstation, based on a mirror of 2x 4To WD Red NAS (type EFRX, CMR) drives.
I use a mirror of 2x SSD (Micron MX500) as a L2 cache.
On v3.2.0, no problem, everything works as expected, whatever the settings.
On v4.0.1, I can't create the cache because of error message "4Kn disks not supported".
However there was no difference on my hardware and Storage Spaces setup.
So this is a regression, and I need it fixed in order to upgrade Primocache to v4.0.1
Thanks & regards !
Regression on v4.0.1 compared to v3.2.0 for "wrong 4Kn HDD detection"
Re: Regression on v4.0.1 compared to v3.2.0 for "wrong 4Kn HDD detection"
It was mentioned in the initial announcement that the drives 4Kn are not supported in release 4.0.1. The support is expected to come in a future version. From my experience, you can set L1 cache for a 4Kn drive with PC 3.2.0 but you cannot use such a drive for L2 cache for any released version of PC. Hopefully, it will be changed in the near future.
Re: Regression on v4.0.1 compared to v3.2.0 for "wrong 4Kn HDD detection"
Hi, thanks for your comment, but the problems are:janusz521 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 11:09 amIt was mentioned in the initial announcement that the drives 4Kn are not supported in release 4.0.1. The support is expected to come in a future version. From my experience, you can set L1 cache for a 4Kn drive with PC 3.2.0 but you cannot use such a drive for L2 cache for any released version of PC. Hopefully, it will be changed in the near future.
- WD Red Nas are NOT 4Kn drives but 512e (==> false positive error)
- v3.2.0 was Ok with these drives, v4.0.1 is not, this is a regression
That is why these are bugs.
Re: Regression on v4.0.1 compared to v3.2.0 for "wrong 4Kn HDD detection"
@dmist, Your Storage Spaces volume is a 4Kn volume. You may verify it by the command "fsutil fsinfo sectorInfo X:" where X is your Storage Spaces volume.
v3.x or prior versions doesn't check if a drive is a 4Kn volume or not, and have bugs. We will issue a new version in this month.
Thanks.
v3.x or prior versions doesn't check if a drive is a 4Kn volume or not, and have bugs. We will issue a new version in this month.
Thanks.
Re: Regression on v4.0.1 compared to v3.2.0 for "wrong 4Kn HDD detection"
Theoretically, it should be no problem.