Here are a few benchmarks for disk transfer rates for different disk scenarios
on the same PC without and with RAM caching using 1GB of random data.
Specs:
Core i7-3930k, 64GB RAM, not O.C.'d, Windows 7 64bit Ultimate
ASUS P9X79 Deluxe with additional LSI SAS/SATA3 controllers 6Gb/s
All HDDs are latest gen Seagate Barracuda, All SSDs are Plextor M5S 256GB.
This PC is a dedicated sample server in a music production setup. It stores and serves
soft synth audio samples for various instruments at the same time (30+) to be recorded and played
back through a software sequencer (SONAR X2 Producer). The data is hence mostly static after installation.
RAM caching with FancyCache v0.8beta
ONLY read caching; write caching is too unsafe, and for this application, almost useless
since the data on disks storing samples is mostly static..
Most important are READ rates
On each line below:
LEFT tables : results without RAM caching
OTHER tables : results with read-only RAM caching active (default config & cache size 4GB)
1. HDD E: - Seagate 3TB connected to P9X79 main controller @ 6Gb/s
2. HDD S: - Seagate 3TB connected to LSI through SATA3 removable tray bay @ 6Gb/s
Note: the limitation seems to be the tray itself.
3. HDD D: - Seagate 3TB ASUS cached by SSD using P9X79 Marvell controller @ 6Gb/s
4. SSD F: - Plextor M5S 256GB connected to LSI controller @ 6Gb/s
5. HDD C: - The SYSTEM disk - Seagate 1TB (older gen) connected to the P9X79 main controller @ 6Gb/s
Effect of RAM caching on a music server with SSD
Re: Effect of RAM caching on a music server with SSD
Hi iamnemo,
Thank you for your testings and feedback.
Just for your reference, when you use CrystalDiskMark, if test size is less then cache size, you always will get a high score because the test data is 100% cached and the cache hit rate is 100%. You may refer to the link below for more scenarios.
http://www.romexsoftware.com/en-us/fanc ... k-cdm.html
Thank you for your testings and feedback.
Just for your reference, when you use CrystalDiskMark, if test size is less then cache size, you always will get a high score because the test data is 100% cached and the cache hit rate is 100%. You may refer to the link below for more scenarios.
http://www.romexsoftware.com/en-us/fanc ... k-cdm.html