.

FAQ, getting help, user experience about FancyCache
Post Reply
jxf011
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:32 pm

.

Post by jxf011 »

.
Last edited by jxf011 on Thu Jul 04, 2013 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Support
Support Team
Support Team
Posts: 3017
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:42 am

Re: Physical memory cache usage very high despite low L1 val

Post by Support »

Hi jxf011,

You may increase the cache block size to reduce overhead.
jxf011
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:32 pm

Post by jxf011 »

.
Last edited by jxf011 on Thu Jul 04, 2013 10:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Support
Support Team
Support Team
Posts: 3017
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:42 am

Re: Physical memory cache usage very high despite low L1 val

Post by Support »

Well, an issue of L2 SSD caching which will increase memory usage has been addressed. It will be fixed in next versions. Thanks.
jxf011
Level 1
Level 1
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:32 pm

Post by jxf011 »

.
Last edited by jxf011 on Thu Jul 04, 2013 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
GunnzAkimbo
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2013 7:39 am

Re: Physical memory cache usage very high despite low L1 val

Post by GunnzAkimbo »

Im seeing extremely high memory usage setting 11 Drives with 128MB L1 each. Should only total about 1.5GB of cache but it eats up about 10GB of memory...
If i turn all the caching off, it returns to the normal levels i had before installing FC.
Whats the deal there? incredibly excessive memory reserves.
I have 32GB system memory.
User avatar
Support
Support Team
Support Team
Posts: 3017
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:42 am

Re: Physical memory cache usage very high despite low L1 val

Post by Support »

small block size will cause lots of overhead memory, especially on large-capacity volumes/disks.
Post Reply