SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

FAQ, getting help, user experience about FancyCache
Post Reply
motoleon
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:00 pm

SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Post by motoleon »

Windows 7 SP1 64 BIT, VBOX machine 1500mb RAM, 2 cores, run from USB disk on host machine (i7 8G notebook).

Normal disk access:
ORIGINAL.jpg
ORIGINAL.jpg (81.09 KiB) Viewed 14014 times
SuperSpeed SuperCache 5, 512M, 8K, R/W, DIF 10SEC
SUPERCACHE.jpg
SUPERCACHE.jpg (83.39 KiB) Viewed 14014 times
FancyCache 0.7, 512M, 8K, R/W, DIF 10SEC
FANCYCACHE.jpg
FANCYCACHE.jpg (82.7 KiB) Viewed 14014 times
No coments. :o
User avatar
Support
Support Team
Support Team
Posts: 3628
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:42 am

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Post by Support »

Thank you for the feedback!
minhgi
Level 10
Level 10
Posts: 256
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Post by minhgi »

I have both use Supercache and Fancycache.

Fancycache is the better option.
sparkler
Level 3
Level 3
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:06 am

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Post by sparkler »

ive trialed supercache it corrupted both disks ive used it on only one had deferred write on
CosminNet
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:35 pm

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Post by CosminNet »

sparkler wrote:ive trialed supercache it corrupted both disks ive used it on only one had deferred write on
also trialed supercache and got corrupted files on two machines several times. on one i had to reinstall windows and both had lazy writes on. seems that the app did not flush files on shutdown and soemtimes it mixed pieces between files. since they have so many certifications i thought it sould be great but it was worse than dissapointing. also the price of 80$ (for desktop as for server it's a lot more) seems excessive. after i had the troubes i had i would not use that even if they paid me. they also don't have any forums or someone correct me if i'm worng.

fancycache (this is a catchy name :) ) actually seems as fast as or a bit faster than superspeed (subjectively speaking) but so far did not have any troubles. also hope that pricing will be sensible when it retails.
inspron
Level 2
Level 2
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:59 pm

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Post by inspron »

I hope beta testers that I has been providing valuable feedback on this forum get a complimentary copy a steep discount.
minhgi
Level 10
Level 10
Posts: 256
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Post by minhgi »

I said if you bought a copy of Primo Ramdisk, we should get a discount for Fancycache. Like a bundle. I have not seem company that put so much pride in their product and customer support. Romeo can have my money when Fancycache come out.

I pay for SuperCache and Ramdisk PLus. The two product cause me noting but grief.
gabrielmorrow
Level 4
Level 4
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Post by gabrielmorrow »

minhgi wrote:I said if you bought a copy of Primo Ramdisk, we should get a discount for Fancycache. Like a bundle. I have not seem company that put so much pride in their product and customer support. Romeo can have my money when Fancycache come out.

I pay for SuperCache and Ramdisk PLus. The two product cause me noting but grief.
if your gonna buy it you can email sales and there sale you it but they dont recommend you buy it since its beta

personaly ive done bought a copy i dont mind paying for good software even if it was donationware id still pay
Post Reply