Search found 26 matches

by piquadrat
Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:36 am
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: Primocache stops writing to L2 after a while
Replies: 25
Views: 16986

Re: Primocache stops writing to L2 after a while

If you are loosing counters randomly there is a fix I found and presented here:
viewtopic.php?f=35&t=2582&p=7341#p7341
Never have had problems since I applied this.
by piquadrat
Sun Sep 14, 2014 4:13 am
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: How "readable" is the Primocache caching data by itself?
Replies: 7
Views: 5094

Re: How "readable" is the Primocache caching data by itself?

But when you encrypt a partition and then cache it with PrimoCache (L2), is the data encrypted on the cache volume too? I would have run a test on that too even if it wasn't a part of my initial concern, but Primocache 1.01 was unable to recognise TrueCrypt volumes on my system. Use encrypted file ...
by piquadrat
Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:11 am
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: How "readable" is the Primocache caching data by itself?
Replies: 7
Views: 5094

Re: How "readable" is the Primocache caching data by itself?

But when you encrypt a partition and then cache it with PrimoCache (L2), is the data encrypted on the cache volume too?
by piquadrat
Wed Jul 30, 2014 5:53 am
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: Primocache stops writing to L2 after a while
Replies: 25
Views: 16986

Re: Primocache stops writing to L2 after a while

Since SATA channels are fully capable of independently and asynchronously reading and writing to different channels, I see no reason for any L2 delay at all.(...). Well, it is not so simple. If one wants to read from the volume and write to the cache at the same time the speed of such operations sh...
by piquadrat
Fri Jul 11, 2014 3:52 am
Forum: Submit Suggestions
Topic: Auto-repair corrupted performance counters?
Replies: 11
Views: 18282

Re: Auto-repair corrupted performance counters?

There is a registry value (not present on default) which prevents PerfLib from disabling counters (for instance if internal checking fails). To prevent auto disabling counters one has to do the following: Locate in the registry: HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Perflib Add the follo...
by piquadrat
Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:10 pm
Forum: Submit Suggestions
Topic: Write buffer on L2
Replies: 4
Views: 3977

Re: Write buffer on L2

If you have 2GB of defer waiting it means you have sequential transfer or Latency set to very high.
Detecting if the transfer is sequential or random is very hard and does not work correctly in case of alternative cache solutions (tested by myself).
Where SSD's perform best RAM is even better.
by piquadrat
Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:21 pm
Forum: Submit Suggestions
Topic: Write buffer on L2
Replies: 4
Views: 3977

Re: Write buffer on L2

But what's the point of L2 cache for write operations if you can use L1 for the same thing and with better performance.
You want to accelerate big sequential writing? You'll wear out ssd quickly that way.
by piquadrat
Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:42 pm
Forum: Report Bugs
Topic: L2 cache corrupted 0.99
Replies: 14
Views: 11954

Re: L2 cache corrupted 0.99

Redundant Arrays (RAID) include verification subroutines only as optional maintenance procedure. It is not build as a part of the storage system per se. Too much performance penalty. Besides if inconsistency occurs how one is able to tell, which source is corrupted (cache or drive)?
by piquadrat
Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:09 pm
Forum: Submit Suggestions
Topic: Save L1 cache to disk
Replies: 2
Views: 3185

Re: Save L1 cache to disk

That would increase the Hit Ratio considerably. But I'm willing to propose configurable storage for L1 saving. Not all of us use L1 in conjunction with L2. The saving system should cover all scenarios for instance separate L1 and L1/L2 caches for different partitions etc.
by piquadrat
Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:24 pm
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: No cache hit..
Replies: 1
Views: 2175

Re: No cache hit..

That's because windows uses its own disk cache and the second run usually comes from it. It seems that Primo do not interfere in this cache. It intercepts hard drive calls. No calls -> no led -> no count. I say, don't worry, as windows cache is in RAM so the fastest source available. But it happens ...