Search found 13 matches

by insertrealname
Wed May 01, 2019 4:09 pm
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: Windows 10 "Core Isolation" and "Memory Integrity" PrimoCache incompatibility
Replies: 1
Views: 1925

Windows 10 "Core Isolation" and "Memory Integrity" PrimoCache incompatibility

Windows 10 (all editions) users with compatible hardware can enable the "Core Isolation" and "Memory Integrity" system core features described at https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Windows-Insider-Program/Windows-Defender-System-Guard-Making-a-leap-forward-in-platform/td-p/16...
by insertrealname
Thu Feb 18, 2016 5:00 pm
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: Interruptions while playing
Replies: 17
Views: 8476

Re: Interruptions while playing

Keeping 10% unallocated space on *any* size of SSD is always a good idea since it gives the SSD's firmware room enough to move internal data around efficiently.
by insertrealname
Tue Aug 30, 2011 1:52 pm
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore
Replies: 21
Views: 17194

Re: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore

ohh sorry i did not pay attention... you are right real used value are on the monitor... as i say support will tell later :) insertrealname, have you made some tests ? I'm on vacation until 2nd week September--I'll be making more tests after that, hope to (in)validate my error report (if I'm able t...
by insertrealname
Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:52 am
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore
Replies: 21
Views: 17194

Re: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore

Thanks for the links and suggestions, I will follow them up.

(But I won't be able to do so until late September--including further experiments to see if these errors are really Fancy.Cache's fault.)
by insertrealname
Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:12 pm
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore
Replies: 21
Views: 17194

Re: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore

O.K., now I have some data. No Windows Event ID 55 (Error: NTFS corruption) yet, but Windows Event ID 134 (Warning: transaction resource manager recovery). Neither message occurs when Fancy.Cache is not installed and active. I have configured Fancy.Cache for Volumes 0.6.2 in the following way: DARKM...
by insertrealname
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:51 pm
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore
Replies: 21
Views: 17194

Re: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore

support wrote:Thanks, insertrealname.

We'll verify the corruption issue you reported. Also waiting for your next results.
Don't expect anything before a week or more.
by insertrealname
Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:09 pm
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore
Replies: 21
Views: 17194

Re: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore

Always AHCI. Sorry for the delay in answering; yesterday I noticed that the Windows event log had the following events every time I have rebooted since 2011/07/16 (approximately when I started using Fancy.Cache): Log Name: System Source: Ntfs Date: 2011-07-22 21:38:47 Event ID: 134 Task Category: (2...
by insertrealname
Wed Jul 20, 2011 3:23 pm
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore
Replies: 21
Views: 17194

Re: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore

I did try an earlier version of fancy.cache about 3 months ago, but it was the "disk" version, and I did not use Windows Backup & Restore during that time.
by insertrealname
Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:26 pm
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore
Replies: 21
Views: 17194

Fancy.cache 0.6.2 incompatible w/Win 7 Backup & Restore

Hello, I decided to try fancy.cache for volumes 0.6.2 a week ago, caching the C: system volume with 2GB cache/4K block size/LFU-R/30 sec. deferred write on a notebook with 8GB ram, Windows 7 x64 Ultimate SP1. The only major trouble so far is that fancy.cache must be stopped before backups using Win ...
by insertrealname
Sun Nov 28, 2010 8:19 pm
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: Optimal cache block size?
Replies: 1
Views: 3649

Optimal cache block size?

What are the considerations concerning optimal cache size with respect to the size of data transfers to and from the physical disk? I'm assuming that the Windows driver layer below FancyCache will probably read or write much larger segments of data than the cache block, and that FancyCache batches r...