Search found 12 matches
- Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:54 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Next Version?
- Replies: 95
- Views: 1035356
Re: Next Version?
I think I have found out way my computer is crashing on my Raid 5. Primocache driver seem like it can not handle large overhead memory consumption. When I lower the cluster size to 8k, the overhead memory requirement is at a staggering 2.7GB of physical memory. Primocache did not crash. If I lower ...
- Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:39 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Next Version?
- Replies: 95
- Views: 1035356
Re: Next Version?
I think I have found out way my computer is crashing on my Raid 5. Primocache driver seem like it can not handle large overhead memory consumption. When I lower the cluster size to 8k, the overhead memory requirement is at a staggering 2.7GB of physical memory. Primocache did not crash. If I lower ...
- Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:04 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Next Version?
- Replies: 95
- Views: 1035356
Re: Next Version?
Or I can just Storage VMotion some VMs between datastores and watch the cache fill up!
- Thu Jun 20, 2013 8:33 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Next Version?
- Replies: 95
- Views: 1035356
Re: Next Version?
So no dynamic disk. Good fine. Just want to report in that I did a 4 hours stress test with L1 / L2 enable on my laptop. It seem to be very stable. Sleep and hibernation works as normal and no slow down like some have reported with version .80. Some data verse other cache software with persistent L...
- Thu Jun 20, 2013 7:51 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Next Version?
- Replies: 95
- Views: 1035356
Re: Next Version?
@Turikina, My SSD was partition with 16GB of space out of the 60GB. But first I formatted the 16GB partition in NTFS with Windows Disk Manager. After that, formatted it again with Primocache. That should work and good luck. I can't wait to test it on my home built workstation. I need to buy two OCZ...
- Thu Jun 20, 2013 7:24 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Next Version?
- Replies: 95
- Views: 1035356
Re: Next Version?
What is required for L2 cache? Can a partition on a SSD be used or must an entire disk be committed to L2 cache? I have two SSDs installed on a Windows 2012 server each with a 60GB partition mirrored as the C: drive then 173GB of open space after that. If I create a volume with the 173GB of free spa...
- Tue May 07, 2013 5:40 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: SSD cache for Win8 Storage Spaces
- Replies: 9
- Views: 19810
Re: SSD cache for Win8 Storage Spaces
If you have a UPS connected to your Windows server and have it configured to gracefully power down if the UPS detects a power loss, you can use the following command to boost write performance on parity vdisks in Storage Spaces: Set-StoragePool -FriendlyName <Storage Pool Name> -IsPowerProtected $Tr...
- Fri Apr 12, 2013 6:41 pm
- Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
- Topic: [2012-04-19] v0.8.0 was released.. now it's 3-2013
- Replies: 12
- Views: 22690
Re: [2012-04-19] v0.8.0 was released.. now it's 3-2013
I wish they can give us an insight on the progress. It would keep us inform and interest in the fancycache. I have check here regularly for over a year. I stop posting b/c of lost lost interest. Same here. I really want to buy this software once they fix the memory leak with using SSDs as layer 2 c...
- Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:03 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Final Release ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4010
Re: Final Release ?
Same here! Been testing Fancycache for a few months and really like it. Myself and another fellow IT worker have money in hand to buy a license each once the final version is released.
- Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:49 pm
- Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
- Topic: High memory usage / memory caching disable
- Replies: 14
- Views: 25339
Re: High memory usage / memory caching disable
There wouldn't happen to be an ETA on the next version, would there?support wrote:Hi knumsi,
If you enabled L2 cache, then this issue may be caused by L2 cache. We have fixed it in next versions.
Thanks.